Liquidity & Technical

Liquidity & Technical

Daily turnover of roughly ₹1.4 crore makes RAJESHEXPO institutionally untradable — a five-day clearance window absorbs only 0.04% of float, so any fund above ~$10M AUM is capacity-constrained before the chart matters. The technical setup is negative: price sits 38% below its 200-day SMA inside a death-cross structure that has held since April 2023, with momentum re-rolling over and realized volatility in the stressed band.

1. Portfolio implementation verdict

5-day capacity @ 20% ADV (₹ cr)

1.23

Max position cleared in 5d (% of mcap)

4.0%

Fund AUM, 5% wt @ 20% ADV (₹ cr)

27.7

20-day ADV / mcap (%)

4.7%

Technical score (-6 to +6)

-5

2. Price snapshot

Last close (₹)

98.73

YTD return (%)

-44.7%

1-year return (%)

-51.0%

52w position (0=low, 100=high)

11.7

Beta vs broad market (est.)

1.05

The stock sits 11.7% of the way through its 52-week range — closer to the 2026-03-30 capitulation low of ₹80.38 than to any local high — after a 51% one-year drawdown and an 81% drop over five years. From the all-time high of ₹1,029.70 (intraday, 06-Feb-2023) it is down roughly 90%.

3. Trend chart — full history with 50d and 200d SMA

Loading...

Caption: this is an unambiguous downtrend. Price is below both moving averages; both moving averages are still falling.

4. Relative strength

The provisioned benchmark for India (INDA) was not loaded into the relative-performance dataset for this run, so a true rebased comparison vs the broad market is unavailable. The single-name index below shows how each ₹100 invested three years ago has evolved.

Loading...

A ₹100 stake three years ago is worth ₹17 today — five-year total return is −81% (per the price file). A direct rebased Nifty 50 series was not loaded for this run, but Indian large-cap indices have advanced over a comparable window, so the relative-performance gap versus the broad market is wide and has continued to widen rather than narrow. Most of the destruction came after Q1 FY2025, following the FY25 earnings reset.

5. Momentum — RSI(14) and MACD histogram

Loading...
Loading...

RSI is 34.66 — approaching but not yet at the 30 oversold threshold — while the MACD histogram has flipped negative again after the April relief rally and is widening to the downside (−1.31 today vs −0.55 last week). This is not a bullish divergence: RSI is making lower local highs (the April peak at 71 was lower than the December 75) and price is making lower lows. Near-term (1–3 month) momentum signal is bearish; only an oversold capitulation print (RSI sub-20, as in the March low) would historically have set up the kind of mean-reversion bounce traded in April.

6. Volume, volatility, sponsorship

Loading...
No Results

Every one of the top-ten volume spikes is an up day (same-day return positive). Bounces draw episodic flows (retail or event-driven) that fail to follow through. This is consistent with a stock that lacks sustained institutional sponsorship; the data file shows no exchange-filed catalyst tied to these spikes, so the underlying drivers remain unattributed.

Loading...

Current 30-day realized vol is 46.6%, above the 5-year 80th percentile of 43.0% and well above the median of 28.7% (percentile bands from data/tech/volatility.json). The tape is in a stressed regime — the market is demanding a wider risk premium. Vol expansion has accompanied price destruction since early FY25, which is consistent with forced selling rather than orderly repricing.

7. Institutional liquidity panel

A. ADV and turnover

ADV 20d (shares)

124,146

ADV 20d (₹ cr)

1.38

ADV 60d (shares)

246,262

ADV 20d / mcap (%)

4.7%

Annual turnover, est. (%)

20.5%

20-day ADV (124k shares) is roughly half of 60-day ADV (246k) — liquidity has compressed sharply in the past two months as the stock has slid. Annual turnover (estimated at ~20% from 60-day ADV × 250 sessions / ~30 cr shares outstanding) is concentrated on a handful of spike days; on a typical session the order book is too thin for size.

B. Fund-capacity table

No Results

Read it as a hard ceiling: a fund running a 5% position at 20% ADV — already an aggressive participation rate — needs to be no larger than ~₹27.7 crore (about $2.9M) to build that position inside one trading week. Most domestic small-cap mutual funds are 50–100× that size. The supportable AUM ceiling for a 2% position at the more realistic 10% ADV rate is ~₹30.7 crore (about $3.2M).

C. Liquidation runway

No Results

A 1% issuer-level position — modest by long-only standards — takes 121 trading days (~6 calendar months) to clear at 20% ADV participation, or roughly a year at the safer 10% rate. A 2% position requires more than two years to exit at 10% ADV. In a sustained drawdown the implicit cost of that lock-up is enormous.

D. Execution friction

The median daily price range over the last 60 sessions is 4.52% — more than double the 2% threshold for "elevated impact cost." Combined with two zero-volume sessions in the same window, every buy or sell of size walks through a wide spread; bid-offer plus slippage on a 0.5%-of-mcap exit easily costs another 200–300 bps on top of the time decay.

Bottom line: no size clears 5 days at 20% ADV other than a sub-0.05%-of-mcap position. At 10% ADV the answer is the same. This stock is implementable only for vehicles below roughly ₹70 crore (about $7M) total AUM that can tolerate a one-to-six-month exit window.

8. Technical scorecard and stance

No Results

Stance — negative setup, 3-to-6 month horizon

The composite technical score is −5 out of +6. Trend, momentum, volume, volatility, and relative strength all read negative; only the proximity to the 52-week low is non-negative, and even that is "neutral" rather than supportive without an accumulation signature on the tape. The current chart structure does not support stepping in front of the prevailing trend.

Two levels that would change the view. A monthly close above ₹160 — the current 200-day SMA — would invalidate the multi-year downtrend; that is the threshold a counter-trend long should require. A close below ₹80.38 — the 2026-03-30 low — would mark continuation of the downtrend and open scope toward double-digit-handle pricing.

Implementation footnote. Liquidity is the constraint. Even for a fund that develops a fundamental thesis here, position sizing collides with capacity well before valuation matters: the recommended action is watchlist-only for any vehicle above ₹70 crore (about $7M) AUM, with a hard rule that a position is built only after a price-and-volume confirmation above ₹160. Specialist microcap or family-office mandates can scale in slowly over multiple weeks at 10% ADV; everyone else should pass.